MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
| fixed length control field |
04030ntm a2200337 i 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
| control field |
MY-KuUP |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
| control field |
20260206154938.0 |
| 006 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--ADDITIONAL MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS |
| fixed length control field |
t||||fr|||| 000 0 |
| 007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION |
| fixed length control field |
ta |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
| fixed length control field |
260206t20252025my a|||fr|||| 000 0 eng d |
| 020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER |
| International Standard Book Number |
THE0010328 (Local) |
| Qualifying information |
Hardback |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
| Original cataloging agency |
UMPSA |
| Language of cataloging |
eng |
| Transcribing agency |
UMPSA |
| Description conventions |
rda |
| 090 ## - LOCALLY ASSIGNED LC-TYPE CALL NUMBER (OCLC); LOCAL CALL NUMBER (RLIN) |
| Classification number (OCLC) (R) ; Classification number, CALL (RLIN) (NR) |
FKOM .A44 2025 r Thesis |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
| Personal name |
Tan, Amelia, |
| Relator term |
author. |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
| Title |
A fuzzy multi-criteria requirements prioritization model using cost-value on stakeholder perspectives / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. |
Tan Amelia |
| 264 #1 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE |
| Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture |
Kuantan, Pahang : |
| Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer |
UMPSA, |
| Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice |
2025 |
| 264 #4 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE |
| Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice |
© 2025 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
| Extent |
xii, 198 pages : |
| Other physical details |
illustrations ; |
| Dimensions |
30 cm. + |
| Accompanying material |
1 CD-ROM |
| 336 ## - CONTENT TYPE |
| Source |
rdacontent |
| Content type term |
text |
| 337 ## - MEDIA TYPE |
| Source |
rdamedia |
| Media type term |
unmediated |
| 338 ## - CARRIER TYPE |
| Source |
rdacarrier |
| Carrier type term |
volume |
| 347 ## - DIGITAL FILE CHARACTERISTICS |
| Source |
rda |
| File type |
text file |
| Encoding format |
PDF |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
| General note |
Faculty of Computing |
| 502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE |
| Dissertation note |
Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah - 2025 |
| 504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
| Bibliography, etc. note |
Include bibliographical reference |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
| Summary, etc. |
Requirements prioritization is a critical phase in requirements engineering to ensure limited resources are allocated to produce optimum business value. Traditional cost-value models, while commonly used, suffer from issues of subjectivity, limited stakeholder participation, and scalability problems. Stakeholders usually label all requirements as high priority, which complicates decision-making. This, combined with inadequate stakeholder involvement, an excessive number of evaluation criteria, and a lack of empirical validation, reduces the effectiveness and practicality of prioritization models in real-world applications. This study aims to enhance the cost-value approach in requirements prioritization by integrating the BOCR classification with FAHP and FTOPSIS. The objective is to measure the perspectives of clients and developers in producing prioritization results while improving overall accuracy, reducing time consumption, and increasing usability. A semi-automated prioritization model named Reprocolla is developed by combining the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) for weighting criteria and the Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) for ranking requirements. Reprocolla adopts the BOCR (Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, Risks) framework to classify evaluation criteria and utilizes fuzzy logic to mitigate human judgment uncertainty. The proposed model was validated using seven datasets derived from both real-world software projects and benchmark datasets. The evaluation used a combination of inferential and descriptive statistics. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient was used to assess accuracy to measure alignment with ground truth prioritization. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to identify significant differences in time consumption between clients and developers. The Chi-Square test was used to determine the relationship between user roles and perceived usability levels. Reprocolla improved prioritization accuracy by 5% compared to the base model (without BOCR), as measured by the Pearson Correlation Coefficient. It also reduced average prioritization time by 36% and received the highest ease-of-use score by 70%. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in prioritization outcomes between clients and developers. This suggests that Reprocolla is consistent and balanced across different stakeholder perspectives. This research contributes an empirically validated, stakeholder-inclusive, and scalable prioritization model that improves decision-making performance in software development. It also provides an open dataset and a web-based application, which is a software requirements prioritization tool. It reinforces the relevance and applicability of the cost-value approach to supporting effective decision-making in software requirements engineering. |
| 610 20 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--CORPORATE NAME |
| Corporate name or jurisdiction name as entry element |
Faculty of Computing |
| General subdivision |
Dissertations |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Universities and colleges |
| General subdivision |
Dissertations |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Theses |
| General subdivision |
Dissertations |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Library of Congress Classification |
| Koha item type |
Thesis |