Comparative method between electrocoagulation and ozonolysis for sulphide removal / (Record no. 7609)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03394ntm a2200373 i 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field vtls000102815
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field KUKTEM
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20251117113356.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180119s2017 my a f am 000 0 eng d
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number THE0000911(Local)
039 #9 - LEVEL OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTROL AND CODING DETAIL [OBSOLETE]
Level of rules in bibliographic description 201905271538
Level of effort used to assign nonsubject heading access points nazirah
Level of effort used to assign subject headings 201802201210
Level of effort used to assign classification saini
-- 201801191049
-- saini
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency UMP
Language of cataloging eng
Transcribing agency UMP
Description conventions rda
090 ## - LOCALLY ASSIGNED LC-TYPE CALL NUMBER (OCLC); LOCAL CALL NUMBER (RLIN)
Classification number (OCLC) (R) ; Classification number, CALL (RLIN) (NR) FKKSA .H53 2017 r Bc.
100 0# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Nor Hidayah Nordin,
Relator term author.
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Comparative method between electrocoagulation and ozonolysis for sulphide removal /
Statement of responsibility, etc. Nor Hidayah Nordin
264 #1 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture Kuantan, Pahang :
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer UMP,
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2017
264 #4 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice © 2017
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent xv, 59 pages :
Other physical details illustrations (some color) ;
Dimensions 30 cm. +
Accompanying material 1 CD-ROM
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Content type term text
Source rdacontent
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Content type term text
Source rdacontent
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Media type term unmediated
Source rdamedia
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Media type term computer
Source rdamedia
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Carrier type term volume
Source rdacarrier
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Carrier type term computer dics
Source rdacarrier
347 ## - DIGITAL FILE CHARACTERISTICS
File type text file
Encoding format PDF
Source rda
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Faculty of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering
502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE
Dissertation note Project Paper (Bachelor of Chemical Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2017
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc. note Includes bibliographical references
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Sulphide is one of the example of contaminants contains in industries and give harmful effect to human, plant, and environment. High amount of sulphide content contributed to corrosion of pipe in industries. In this research, it was intended to develop the new technologies by using comparison between Ozonolysis and Electrocoagulation (EC) method that will give the highest percentage of Sulphide removal. The experiment was carried out in batch reactor and conducted under galvanostatic regime at current 1A and the voltage supply was 30V. Both of methods were run in 0.8L of sample solutions which were stock sulphide and sample from MTBE companies. Concentrations of both samples at influent were varied at (50,100,150 and 200) ppm. EC process involved Iron electrodes where arrangements of electrodes monopolar-parallel (M-P) and bipolar-parallel (B-P) were investigated in this research. By weighing both the electrode before and after electrocoagulation and based on Faraday’s law, weight of precipitated were determined. Ozone injection during ozonolysis was 10% for all trials. Solutions had been used in both method were taken at regular times at (3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 minutes) to measure Sulphide removal while (15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes) for COD removal. Then, percentage of Sulphide removal was calculated and efficiency of COD removal was evaluated. In ozonolysis, 98.97% of sulphide removal had achieved by using sample from MTBE, while only 48.48% sulphide removal used in stock sulphide. The arrangement of B-P electrode had achieved 77.57% and 84.87% of Sulphide and COD removal, while in monopolar only 40% and 78.64%of Sulphide and COD removal respectively. In conclusion, sample from MTBE gave the high quality in removal of Sulphide in ozonolysis treatment, and B-P arrangement was the best position to determine the highest percentage of Sulphide removal in electrocoagulation.
610 20 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--CORPORATE NAME
Corporate name or jurisdiction name as entry element Faculty of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering
General subdivision Dissertations
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Universities and Colleges
General subdivision Dissertations
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Theses
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
  Not lost   Not for loan UMPLIB GAMBANG UMPLIB GAMBANG 04/09/2019   FKKSA .H53 2017 r Bc. 0000122194 04/09/2019 1 04/09/2019 Final Year Report
  Not lost   Not for loan UMPLIB GAMBANG UMPLIB GAMBANG 04/09/2019   CD 11177 | FKKSA .H53 2017 r Bc. 0000122195 04/09/2019 1 04/09/2019 Final Year Report

Perpustakaan Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
26600 Pekan, Pahang Darul Makmur
Phone: +609 431 5063 (Gambang) / +609 431 5035 (Pekan)
Email: umplibrary@umpsa.edu.my

Connect With Us