MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
03029ntm a2200349 i 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER |
|---|
| control field |
vtls000103684 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
KUKTEM |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20251117113402.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
180531s2018 my a f am 000 0 eng d |
| 020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER |
|---|
| International Standard Book Number |
THE0001430(Local) |
| 039 #9 - LEVEL OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTROL AND CODING DETAIL [OBSOLETE] |
|---|
| Level of rules in bibliographic description |
201905211441 |
| Level of effort used to assign nonsubject heading access points |
asmadi |
| -- |
201805311438 |
| -- |
saini |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloging agency |
UMP |
| Language of cataloging |
eng |
| Transcribing agency |
UMP |
| Description conventions |
rda |
| 090 ## - LOCALLY ASSIGNED LC-TYPE CALL NUMBER (OCLC); LOCAL CALL NUMBER (RLIN) |
|---|
| Classification number (OCLC) (R) ; Classification number, CALL (RLIN) (NR) |
FTeK .T363 2018 r Bc. |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Tan, Darlene Tzet Lene, |
| Relator term |
author. |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Extraction of propolis by using water and evaluation by TLC, HPLC and UV VIS spectrophotometry / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. |
Darlene Tan Tzet Lene |
| 264 #1 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE |
|---|
| Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture |
Kuantan, Pahang : |
| Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer |
UMP, |
| Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice |
2018 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
xiii, 71 pages : |
| Other physical details |
illustrations (some color) ; |
| Dimensions |
30 cm. + |
| Accompanying material |
1 CD-ROM |
| 336 ## - CONTENT TYPE |
|---|
| Content type term |
text |
| Source |
rdacontent |
| 337 ## - MEDIA TYPE |
|---|
| Media type term |
unmediated |
| Source |
rdamedia |
| 337 ## - MEDIA TYPE |
|---|
| Media type term |
computer |
| Source |
rdamedia |
| 338 ## - CARRIER TYPE |
|---|
| Carrier type term |
volume |
| Source |
rdacarrier |
| 338 ## - CARRIER TYPE |
|---|
| Carrier type term |
computer disc |
| Source |
rdacarrier |
| 347 ## - DIGITAL FILE CHARACTERISTICS |
|---|
| File type |
text file |
| Encoding format |
PDF |
| Source |
rda |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
|---|
| General note |
Faculty of Engineering Technology |
| 502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE |
|---|
| Dissertation note |
Project Paper (Bachelor Of Manufacturing Engineering Technology (Pharmaceutical) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2018 |
| 504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
|---|
| Bibliography, etc. note |
Includes bibliographical references |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
The objective of this research was to perform extraction of propolis using water as extraction solvent and analyze the propolis extract by using Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC), High Performance liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Ultraviolet–Visible (UV-Vis) Spectrophotometry. The effect of propolis to solvent ratio was determined by increasing the ratio from 1:5, 1:10 to 1:15 where the extraction yield of extract were 5.95%, 9.05% and 7.16% respectively. Larger ratio increases extract yield, however, extract yield at ratio larger 1:10 will not further increase percentage. Analysis by UV-Vis Spectrophotometry was carried out to determine the total flavone, flavonols and total phenolic contents in Water Extracted Propolis (WEP). Both contents showed a highest concentration in the 1:5 ratio, which were 3.33 mg Quercetin Equivalent (QE)/g and 6.12 mg Gallic Acid Equivalent (GAE)/g respectively. TLC analysis detected caffeic acid components in WEP at 𝑅𝑓 value of 0.22. However, in HPLC analysis, the caffeic acid was not detected in sample at the retention time of 3.82 minutes as per reference of the standard caffeic acid chromatogram. Split peak and baseline drift were also observed in WEP during HPLC analysis and requires troubleshooting process. WEP showed lower amount of total flavone, flavonols and total phenolic contents as compared to ethanolic extracted peopolis (EEP) and olive oil extracted propolis (OEP). For TLC, chrysin components was detected in EEP whereas none of the components were detected by OEP. For HPLC, caffeic acid were not detected all three propolis extracts. |
| 610 20 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--CORPORATE NAME |
|---|
| Corporate name or jurisdiction name as entry element |
Faculty of Engineering Technology |
| General subdivision |
Dissertations |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Universities and colleges |
| General subdivision |
Disertations |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Theses |