MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
02757nam a2200241 a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER |
|---|
| control field |
vtls000031279 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
KUKTEM |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20251114204355.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
080827t2008 my a f m 000 0 eng|d |
| 020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER |
|---|
| International Standard Book Number |
THE0004252(Local) |
| 039 #9 - LEVEL OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTROL AND CODING DETAIL [OBSOLETE] |
|---|
| Level of rules in bibliographic description |
201905161343 |
| Level of effort used to assign nonsubject heading access points |
farhana |
| Level of effort used to assign subject headings |
201107132111 |
| Level of effort used to assign classification |
VLOAD |
| Level of effort used to assign subject headings |
200908141554 |
| Level of effort used to assign classification |
VLOAD |
| Level of effort used to assign subject headings |
200908141526 |
| Level of effort used to assign classification |
VLOAD |
| -- |
200808271542 |
| -- |
ida84 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloging agency |
UMP |
| 090 ## - LOCALLY ASSIGNED LC-TYPE CALL NUMBER (OCLC); LOCAL CALL NUMBER (RLIN) |
|---|
| Classification number (OCLC) (R) ; Classification number, CALL (RLIN) (NR) |
TP159.M4 S58 2008 rs Thesis |
| 100 0# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Siti Hashimah Mohd Hanif |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Fabrication of chitosan membrane : |
| Remainder of title |
the effetcs of different polyethylene glycol compositions on membrane performance in oily wastewater treatment / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. |
Siti Hashimah Mohd Hanif |
| 246 3# - VARYING FORM OF TITLE |
|---|
| Title proper/short title |
Fabrication of chitosan membrane |
| Medium |
[electronic resource] : |
| Remainder of title |
the effetcs of different polyethylene glycol compositions on membrane performance in oily wastewater treatment |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. |
Kuantan, Pahang : |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. |
UMP, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2008 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
32 p. : |
| Other physical details |
ill. (some col.) ; |
| Dimensions |
30 cm. + |
| Accompanying material |
1 computer disc |
| 502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE |
|---|
| Dissertation note |
Project paper (Bachelor of Chemical Engineering) --- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2008 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
and chemical properties. It can be categorized by the driving forces employed which are microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Ultrafiltration is chosen to do the treatment. Membrane technology has many advantages in treating wastewater such as simple efficient separating devices to restrain oil, grease, metal, BOD and COD. Besides this technology gain low energy cost and provide clear permeate which can be re-used. By considering public health and environmental awareness, biopolymer will be focus. Chitosan is chosen as it is a basic commercialized biopolymer that is prevailingly neutral or acidic. As in membrane separation process it occur fouling problem due to it retentate that attached to the membrane surface. For that chitosan will be crosslink with other polymer which is polyethylene glycol (PEG). PEG is good water permeability and chemically stabilizes to be applying as a membrane coating. Thus improve anti-fouling properties. The performance of this chitosan membrane in oily wastewater treatment is studied by varying different composition of PEG. The membrane morphology is obtained by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The analysis is done by swelling the membrane in oily wastewater. From the analysis the result is get by seeing the percentage of oil that can be absorbed by the membrane of sample X, sample 1, sample 2 and sample 3. As the result sample 3 which consist with 3.6 gram of PEG is the best membrane. As the conclusion, PEG enhanced the performance of Chitosan membrane. Author |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Membranes (Technology) |