Prediction of surface roughness in wire electric discharge machining (EDM) of aluminum alloy based on experimental results / Mohd. Rozaidy Afzan Bin Vitalis
Material type:
TextPublication details: Kuantan, Pahang : UMP, 2009Description: xiv, 59 p. : ill. ; 30 cm. + 1 computer discISBN: - THE0005784(Local)
- Prediction of surface roughness in wire electric discharge machining (EDM) of aluminum alloy based on experimental results [electronic resource]
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final Year Report
|
UMPLIB PEKAN | TA418.7 .R69 2009 rs Bc. (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 0000044375 | ||
Final Year Report
|
UMPLIB PEKAN | CD 4211 | TA418.7 .R69 2009 rs Bc. (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 0000044376 |
Project paper (Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering with Manufacturing Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2009
Surface roughness is one of the most important requirements in machining process. In order to obtain better surface roughness, the proper setting of cutting parameters is crucial before the process take place. The aim of this research is to develop first order and second order prediction mathematical model for Surface roughness using response surface methodology (RSM) when machining using Wire-EDM for aluminum alloy 6061-T6 and compare both mathematical modeling to find the most effective prediction model. SODICK AQ353L machine was used to cut Aluminum Alloy 6061-T6 and PERTHOMETER to measure surface roughness. By using Response Surface Method (RSM) of experiment, first and second order models were developed with 95% confidence level. The machine parameters that had been considered in this study are ON-time, OFF-time, peak discharge current and wire speed. It was established that the surface roughness is most influenced by On-time. The percentage error of surface roughness predicted is calculated to obtain the accuracy of mathematical model build, the second order prediction model gives less percentage error which is 3.29% compare to first order prediction model 3.68%. So, the second order mathematical modeling is more suitable for prediction of surface roughness.