<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04628ntm a2200337 i 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-07-26</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">FTKA .A35 2024 r Thesis</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T000003211</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2024-07-26 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2024-07-26</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">THESIS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-07-26</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">CD13608</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T000003212</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2024-07-26 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2024-07-26</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">THESIS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">101008</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">101014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="003">MY-KuUP</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20251125110909.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">t||||fr|||| 000 0 </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">240726t20242024my a|||fr|||| 000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">THE0009897 (Local)</subfield>
    <subfield code="q">Hardback</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UMPSA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">UMP</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FTKA .A35 2024 r Thesis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Adi Setiabudi Bawono,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Developing seismic risk assessment  and prediction of building's  vulnerability :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">case study of  residential area of yogyakarta,  indonesia /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Adi Setiabudi Bawono</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Kuantan, Pahang :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">UMPSA,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2024</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">&#xA9; 2024</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xxi, 252 pages :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations (some color) ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">30 cm. +</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">1 CD-ROM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rda</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text file</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">PDF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang &#x2013; 2024</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Indonesia is located in an earthquake-risk-prone area. One opportunity to mitigate and  minimize the earthquake impact is understanding the phenomena. Conducting seismic  risk assessment can insist on mitigating the potential risk. Recently in Indonesia, the Hazard United States (HAZUS) method was frequently used in conducting the Seismic  Risk Assessment (SRA). From the literature review, HAZUS needs to be adapted  according to the regional conditions, building materials and local earthquake records. The  localized input may influence the outcome of the assessment. Furthermore, numerous  agencies have proposed a guideline process for conducting a seismic risk assessment in  Indonesia. In addition, the complexity of the assessment also involves the local  parameter, especially the building types. Therefore, in managing the situation, this study  looked at possibilities, Damage Probability Matrix (DPM) for Indonesia typical building  based on mapping damage state estimate to vulnerable function compatible building type  from HAZUS, to succeed the DPM derived traditionally harmonised damage states  threshold to HAZUS. In addition, the main objective of this study is also to improve the  criteria assessment base on local parameters. In consequence, the first step is to identify  and harmonise the damaged state criteria from six (6) different agencies in Indonesia.  Further, DPM was developed based on expert judgement by using Fuzzy Analytic  Hierarchy Process (FAHP). In advance, the developed cumulative probabilistic and DPM  from the HAZUS were compared to assess the proposed DPM. From the results, new  damage state criteria were proposed, ranked, and a few criteria were eliminated based on  expert judgement. The new DPM based on the previous result was developed with the  updated criteria. DPM from HAZUS was developed and compared. DPM proposed was  identical, following the trend of DPM in HAZUS for Reinforced Concrete Moment  Resisting Frames-Low Rise (C1L). Based on the observation, this result can be accepted  to be used. However, the percentage difference range is between -35.52 per cent to 68.39  per cent. Therefore, the findings indicate that while HAZUS is reliable as a standard of  evaluation, adjustments are needed to align buildings evaluated using expert judgement  with the FAHP to the HAZUS C1L model. Additionally, adapting the HAZUS model for  other countries requires careful consideration of differences in hazards, risks,  construction practices, building laws, materials, data availability, and damage thresholds.  Thus, significant modifications may be necessary to ensure accuracy and effectiveness.  It can be concluded the usage of HAZUS needs to be adaptable to the scenario cases at a  specific location. Further study is encouraged to improve the damage state criteria,  especially in Indonesia. Overall, this is a novel study because it is possible to harmonize  the categories and criteria for damage in Indonesia from various agencies, which has  never been done before, using the expert judgment method with FAHP as the model.  Furthermore, this study examines how substantial the difference is between the expert  judgment method and FAHP in searching for the Damage Probability Matrix based on  the most recent seismic zones and regulations as assessed by assessor with experience.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Universities and colleges</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Theses</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">THESIS</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
