<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Temporal graph for fraud detection and analytics</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Leong, Teng Man</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource manuscript="yes">text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">my</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2023</dateIssued>
    <copyrightDate encoding="marc">2023</copyrightDate>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">electronic</form>
    <extent>xi, 39 pages : illustrations ; 1 CD-ROM</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Representing time-based transactions as graphs offers insights for fraud detection. However, limited and confidential datasets pose challenges. To address this, the project aims to assess the quality of generative model by using the generated data in training the fraud classifier model. A generative approach using graph autoencoders is employed to augment data for fraud detection. Experiments utilize the Elliptic dataset, a Bitcoin transaction dataset with 49 connected component graphs representing confirmations at twoweek intervals. A custom variational graph autoencoder (VGAE) is developed, encountering challenges with the defined loss function, resulting in excessive edge reconstruction. Among experimented three graph neural network (GNN) models—Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN), Graph Attention Networks (GAT) and GATv2, it is found that none effectively detect unseen illicit transactions. While GAT and GATv2 outperform GCN, models trained on reconstructed data perform worse than those on purely original data. It is observed the consistent metric fluctuations among models regardless of data used during training. This indicates the VGAE captures underlying patterns. This study highlights challenges and suggests future research directions, including adversarially regularized graph autoencoders, alternative architectures, efficient loss functions, and ensemble methods.</abstract>
  <targetAudience authority="marctarget">specialized</targetAudience>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Leong Teng Man</note>
  <note>Centre for Mathematical Sciences</note>
  <note>Bachelor of Applied Science in Data Analytics with Honours -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 20223</note>
  <note>Includes bibliographical references</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <name type="corporate"/>
    <topic>Dissertations</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Universities and colleges</topic>
    <topic>Dissertations</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Final Year Project</topic>
    <topic>Dissertations</topic>
  </subject>
  <identifier type="isbn">THE0010014 (Local)</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">UMPSA</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">250429</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20251125111037.0</recordChangeDate>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
