<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>An analysis of conclusion section’s moves and steps in engineering final year project presentations</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Wan Raihan Wan Shaaidi</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource manuscript="yes">text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">my</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2024</dateIssued>
    <copyrightDate encoding="marc">2024</copyrightDate>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>xvi, 299 pages : illustrations (some color) ; 30 cm. + 1 CD-ROM</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Final-Year Project Presentations (FYPPs) serve as academic discourses within the  university setting, allowing undergraduates to demonstrate their comprehension of a  targeted subject to an audience. The issue stems from the inconsistent structures of FYPPs  across fields. Despite efforts to establish a standardised structure for the conclusion  section, a noticeable gap persists, particularly within Engineering FYPPs. This gap poses  a hindrance to Engineering students, impending their ability to incorporate practical  structures into their conclusion sections. To address this issue, an exploration of the  conclusion moves and steps in Engineering FYPPs is essential. The study focused on  examining the moves and steps within the conclusion section of the FYPPs, taking into  account the perspectives of FYP students, internal, and external panellists. The research  sought to analyse the conclusion section moves and steps employed by Engineering students during FYPPs and subsequently delved into the evaluations of internal and  external panellists towards the students’ performance of this section. Ultimately, the  study also aspires to develop a model outlining conclusion section moves and steps  specifically tailored for Engineering FYPPs. This study employed the explanatory  sequential mixed-method approach with two adapted questionnaires, to gauge the  perceived traits of Engineering FYPPs conclusion section among students, internal and  external panellists. The qualitative analysis involved examining data from audiorecordings of 27 Engineering FYPPs and conducting individual semi-structured  interviews with 14 internal panellists and 4 external panellists. The findings revealed  unanimous agreement among students, internal panellists, and external panellists on the  effectiveness of certain moves and steps within the conclusion section. Specifically,  summarising the study (Move 1), evaluating the study (Move 2), and providing  deductions (Move 3), were identified moves and steps within a conclusion section.  However, FYP Engineering students frequently neglected specific steps within all the  moves, contradicting their perceptions of desirable conclusion characteristics in FYPPs.  Insights from interviews with the panellists yielded valuable data regarding students’ overall performance concerning the conclusion section, the ideal composition of a  conclusion section, the significance of this section, and methods to overcome challenges  encountered during its effective presentation. The outcomes of this study offer profound  insight into the moves and steps within the conclusion section for FYP students. These  insights serve as a comprehensive guideline for students to refer to before crafting an  impactful conclusion section for their FYPPs. Furthermore, this research has contributed  to illuminating variations among genres within academic fields, particularly in the  context of Engineering FYPPs.</abstract>
  <targetAudience authority="marctarget">specialized</targetAudience>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Wan Raihan Wan Shaaidi</note>
  <note>Center for Modern Language</note>
  <note>Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2024</note>
  <note>Includes bibliographical reference</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <name type="corporate">
      <namePart>Center for Modern Language</namePart>
    </name>
    <topic>Dissertations</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Universities and colleges</topic>
    <topic>Dissertations</topic>
  </subject>
  <identifier type="isbn">THE0010063 (Local)</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">UMPSA</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">250515</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20251125111040.0</recordChangeDate>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
