<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03139ntm a2200349 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">MY-KuUP</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260123113355.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">a||||fs|||| 000 0 </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260123t20252025my a|||fs|||| 000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">THE0010302 (Local)</subfield>
    <subfield code="q">Hardback</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UMPSA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">UMPSA</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FIST .L49 2025 r Bc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lew, Yong Yi,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Functional and characterisation of multi-strain probiotics in encapsulated and non-encapsulated forms of water kefir /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Lew Yong Yi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Kuantan, Pahang :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">UMPSA,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2025</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">&#xA9; 2025</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xv, 84 pages :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations ;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rda</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text file</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">PDF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Final Year Report (Bachelor of Applied Science in Industrial Biotechnology) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah - 2025</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Include bibliographical reference</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Probiotics are living microorganisms known for their health benefits in maintaining gut  health. It is empirically proven with better efficacy in multi-strain formulation than  single-strain formulation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate antimicrobial,  hydrophobicity, auto-aggregation, co-aggregation, acid and bile tolerance, cold tolerance,  and ultrasound cavitation tolerance of a novel multi-strain formulation. Based on the  result, the multi-strain formulation showed a superior antimicrobial effect on Escherichia  coli (80% inhibitory effect) and the least effect on Bacillus subtilis (43.33%). On the  other hand, yeast strain exhibited the highest acid tolerance, achieving a 42.52% survival  rate, while lactic acid bacteria (LAB) had the lowest (32.02%). Similarly, bile tolerance  tests indicated the highest survival in yeast (115.38%) and the lowest in LAB (31.42%)  at 2% (w/v). Moreover, ultrasound treatment revealed an increasing growth trend under  wattages, with LAB achieving its peak at 64W for 6 min (2.91&#xB1;0.04). At 4&#x2103; storage  conditions, the encapsulated LAB showed the highest viable rate (64.96%), while yeast  had only 21.65%. Additionally, encapsulation significantly enhanced hydrophobicity,  with encapsulated probiotics showing 43.03% compared to non-encapsulated forms  (24.20%). However, non-encapsulated probiotics auto-aggregation rates were higher  (82.95% at 24 hours) than encapsulated forms (46.89%). Co-aggregation assays revealed  pathogen-binding capacities for Serratia marcescens (40.74%) and Escherichia coli (15.28%). Overall, our study demonstrated that encapsulated multi-strain formulation has  fulfilled the overall requirements for probiotic product standards. This first study that  evaluates the multi-strain formulation can serve as future research groundwork.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Universities and colleges</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Final Year Report</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/45674</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PSM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-01-23</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">FIST .L49 2025 r Bc.</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T000003681</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-01-23 11:34:16</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-01-23</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PSM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">103914</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">103920</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
