<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03326ntm a2200325 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">MY-KuUP</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260227122024.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">t||||fr|||| 000 0 </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260227t20252025my a|||fr|||| 000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">THE0010401 (Local)</subfield>
    <subfield code="q">Hardback</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UMPSA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">UMPSA</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FIST .W66 2025 r Bc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Wong, Shi Qi,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Physicochemical properties of various honey /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Wong Shi Qi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Kuantan, Pahang :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">UMPSA,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2025</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">&#xA9; 2025</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xii, 63 pages :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations ;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rda</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text file</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">PDF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Final Year Report (Bachelor of Applied Science in Industrial Biotechnology) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah - 2025</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Include bibliographical reference</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In this study, various types of honey commercially available in Malaysia were  considered: Tualang, Kelulut, Gelam, Acacia, and normal commercial brands honey.  While the literature continues to provide concerns about honey&#x2019;s authenticity and quality,  interest developed herein pertains specifically to pH analyses, free acidity, electrical  conductivity, colour intensity, the reducing sugars content, moisture content, ashes, and  the amount of hydroxymethylfurfural. The samples were taken from significant  supermarkets and online retailers, then followed by rigorous laboratory analyses,  including UV-Vis spectrophotometry and other standard methods. The ANOVA analysis  revealed significant differences (p&lt;0.001) in the physicochemical properties across  honey samples. The lowest pH was for Kelulut honey, which was 2.807&#xB1;0.095 and  significantly differed from other samples, while it had the highest free acidity (84.250&#xB1;16.068 meq/kg). Gelam and Commercial honey had the lowest free acidity,  7.000&#xB1;0.000 meq/kg and 5.250&#xB1;1.810 meq/kg, respectively. Acacia honey showed the  highest electrical conductivity (0.662&#xB1;0.131 mS/cm), while the lowest (0.106&#xB1;0.009  mS/cm) was for Commercial honey. In terms of colour intensity, Kelulut honey  demonstrated the darkest colour (3.933&#xB1;1.620), significantly darker than Gelam honey  (1.127&#xB1;0.011). Kelulut honey also recorded the lowest reducing sugars content  (53.534&#xB1;3.347 %), compared to Acacia honey (67.288&#xB1;3.538 %) and Tualang honey  (67.053&#xB1;4.878 %). Moisture content was highest in Kelulut honey (23.665&#xB1;1.104 %),  exceeding the Codex Alimentarius limit for Apis mellifera honey. Acacia honey exhibited  the highest ash content (18.307&#xB1;1.136 %), indicative of its mineral richness. However,  Commercial honey had the highest HMF level of 86.62616.801 mg/kg, exceeding the  permissible limits set by the standards and regulations applied in Malaysia, indicating  heat treatment or prolonged storage. These results emphasise the need for an effective  quality control system and more stringent applications of Malaysia and international  standards to ensure consumer confidence and the authenticity of the products.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Universities and colleges</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PSM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-02-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">FIST .W66 2025 r Bc.</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T000003716</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-02-27 12:20:49</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-02-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">RESTRICT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">104252</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">104258</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
