<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03338ntm a2200337 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">MY-KuUP</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260302112956.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">t||||fr|||| 000 0 </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">c| || |||||||a</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260302t20252025my a|||fs|||| 000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">THE0010405 (Local)</subfield>
    <subfield code="q">Hardback</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UMPSA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">UMPSA</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FIST .C57 2025 r Bc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Claribel Ethel Anak Cajetan,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Analysis of microbial communities in shrimp gut across different stocking  densities /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Claribel Ethel Anak Cajetan</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Kuantan, Pahang :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">UMPSA,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2025</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">&#xA9; 2025</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xi, 119 pages :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations ;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rda</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text file</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">PDF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Final Year Report (Bachelor of Applied Science in Industrial Biotechnology) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah - 2025</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Include bibliographical reference</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Shrimps are multi-organ organisms, with the gut being one of the organs that are essential  for their growth and development. The varied microbial population in the shrimp gut  plays a crucial role since it is required for the digestion and absorption of nutrients.  Stocking density is one of the many variables that may have an impact on the makeup of  the microbial communities in the gut. This study aims to characterize the effects of  varying stocking densities&#x2014;10, 15, and 20 shrimp per tank&#x2014;on the gut microbiome of  shrimp. DNA was extracted from the shrimp intestines, followed by Polymerase Chain  Reaction (PCR) amplification and 16S rRNA sequencing using Illumina technology to  profile the microbial communities. Alpha diversity indices were calculated to assess microbial variation across the different stocking densities. The alpha diversity indices allow us to infer that phylum Firmicutes were the dominant phylum in Tanks 1 and 2,  while phylum Proteobacteria predominated in Tanks 3, 4, 5, and 6. Despite the  differences in microbial composition, phylum Proteobacteria was present in all six tanks,  indicating its widespread presence in the shrimp gut. Statistical analysis (p&lt;0.05) showed  that stocking density significantly impacted the microbial composition, influencing  factors such as shrimp survival rates. This suggests that stocking density not only affects  microbial diversity but also plays a role in shrimp health and survival. The study  emphasizes the importance of optimizing stocking density to maintain a healthy microbial  environment in shrimp aquaculture. By identifying the relationship between stocking  density, microbial communities, and survival rates, the research provides valuable  insights for improving aquaculture practices. The primary objective of this study&#x2014;to  determine the microbial communities in the shrimp gut at different stocking densities and  their relationship with other factors&#x2014;was successfully achieved, offering a foundation  for more sustainable and effective shrimp farming practices.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Universities and colleges</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Final Year Report</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PSM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-03-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">FIST .C57 2025 r Bc.</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T000003720</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-03-02 11:30:27</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-03-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">RESTRICT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">104256</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">104262</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
