<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03383ntm a2200349 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">MY-KuUP</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260612122245.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">t|||||r|||| 000 0 </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260612t20242024my a|||fr|||| 000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">THE0010600 (Local)</subfield>
    <subfield code="q">Hardback</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UMPSA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">UMPSA</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FTKKP .Y44 2024 r Bc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Heng, Yee Phang,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Syngas production via bi-reforming of methane using transition metal based catalysts /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Heng Yee Phang</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Kuantan, Pahang :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">UMPSA,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2024</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">&#xA9; 2024</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xv, 41 pages :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations ;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">rda</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">text file</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">PDF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering Technology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Final Year Report (Bachelor of Chemical Engineering ) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah - 2024</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Include bibliographical reference</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Amidst global concerns over greenhouse gas emissions and fossil fuel depletion, the exploration of clean and sustainable energy became paramount. This research explored the field of methane bi-reforming, an innovative process that simultaneously produced syngas and reduced emissions of both methane and carbon dioxide. Catalyst deactivation in bi-reforming posed challenges, necessitating optimization for enhanced efficiency. This research priortized Ni and Co catalysts because of their balance between effectiveness and affordability. Hence, mono-metallic (Ni and Co) and bi-metallic (Ni-Co) were evaluated via bi-reforming of methane in this study. Three catalysts, 15%Ni/CeO2-CaO, 15%Co/CeO2-CaO and 7.5%Ni-7.5%Co/CeO2-CaO were synthesized using an ultrasonic impregnation-assisted technique and employed in bi-reforming of methane reaction for 8 hours. XRD, BET, SEM and TPO analysis were used to characterize the catalyst. Performance studies were conducted with different catalyst and temperature settings. In accordance with BET analysis, 7.5%Ni-7.5%Co/CeO2-CaO catalyst, possessing the largest surface area, demonstrated the greatest catalytic activity. The results from bi-reforming of methane reaction indicated 7.5%Ni-7.5%Co/CeO2-CaO catalyst displayed superior performance. This was evident in its high conversions, reaching 84% and 92% for CH4 and CO2 respectively, at a temperature of 800&#xB0;C. Temperature variation experiments on the bi-metallic catalyst identified 900&#xB0;C as optimal, achieving 91% CH4 conversion and 75% CO2 conversion. Unexpectedly, the high temperature resulting high ratio of H2/CO. This can be explained by the basic support provided by CeO2-CaO, facilitating the adsorption of CO2 while preventing reverse water gas shift reaction from producing CO. Post-reaction XRD on the spent catalyst at 800&#xB0;C revealed crystalline graphite structures associated with carbon deposition while a lower degree of graphitization at lower temperatures. TPO analysis demonstrated that the bi-metallic catalyst had a high catalytic activity by showing significant amount of graphitic carbon had been deposited on its surface.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering Technology</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Universities and colleges</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Theses</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u"></subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PSM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-06-12</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">FTKKP .Y44 2024 r Bc.</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T000004139</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-06-12 12:23:04</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-06-12</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">RESTRICT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">104990</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">104996</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
