<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02824nam a2200253 a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">vtls000040705</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">KUKTEM</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20251114204405.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">090722t2008    my a   f m    000 0 eng|d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">THE0007477(Local)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="039" ind1=" " ind2="9">
    <subfield code="a">201905161321</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">fawwaz</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">201107132155</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">VLOAD</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">200908141650</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">VLOAD</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">200908141631</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">VLOAD</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">200907221449</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">ida84</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UMP</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TP1150 .Z85 2008 rs Bc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Zul Amri A. Bakar</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Benchmarking of the actual injection of the product versus plastic simulation software /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Zul Amri A. Bakar</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="246" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Benchmarking of the actual injection of the product versus plastic simulation software</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">[electronic resource]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kuantan, Pahang :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">UMP,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2008</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">44 p. :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">ill. (some col.) ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">30 cm. +</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">1 computer disc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Project paper (Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering with Manufacturing) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2008</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The  idea of   this  project,  benchmarking of   the actual   injection of   the product  versus   plastics   simulation  software  is   to do analysis  of   the parameters   that   involved  in  the   plastic   injection  molding   in   order   to   determine   the   best   solution   to   overcome   the   problems and defects that occurred in the plastic injection molding. By actual injection   processes, the results that can be observed are limited such as temperature, stress and the   point  of gate that  are almost  impossible  to be analyzed by naked eye.  Thus,  for such   details   information  the engineer  can depend on Computer  Aided Engineer   (CAE)  or   Computer   Aided  Manufacturing   (CAM)   tools   such   as   in   this   case  Moldflow,   in   generating  the accurate  data of   the parameter   that  has  been analyzed.  The  tools  are   capable in assisting the designation of the mold and the parts that need to be produced   by generates the data that cannot be achieved by doing the actual experiments. Hence,   actual injection analysis needs quite a lot of effort to determine the optimal parameters   for the injection process by experienced expertise. Try and error method was traditional   way in injecting the part into fine product which consumed a lot of time and energy as   well  as  increase  the production cost.  The  result  between software simulation and  the   actual injection might have slight differences because of several factors. The factors can   be determined by doing both analyses and comparing the result will generated the data   of error percentage of the simulation software to actual injection as same as factors of   the errors.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Manufacturing processes</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Injection molding of plastics</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">20000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">20000</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2019-09-04</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">TP1150 .Z85 2008 rs Bc.</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">0000038077</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2019-09-04 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2019-09-04</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PSM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">20000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">20000</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2019-09-04</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">CD 3392 | TP1150 .Z85 2008 rs Bc.</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">0000038078</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2019-09-04 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2019-09-04</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PSM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">VIRTUA40</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">1211</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1217</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">VTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2460*2600*3000*5020*5200*6500*6501*9992</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
