02926nam a2200277 a 4500001001400000003000700014005001700021008004100038020002200079039008400101040000800185090002800193100002200221245008300243246008100326260003500407300006500442502009200507504002800599520164100627650001902268952012202287952013202409999002502541999008202566vtls000045956KUKTEM20251114204409.0100603t2009    my dao f m    000 0 eng d  aTHE0006196(Local) 9a201905151726baidac201107132213dVLOADc201006031032dFiday201006031031zFida  aUMP  aTJ 230 .A99 2009 rs Bc.0 aNurul Azwan Adnan10aMaterial selection in mechanical design of car bumper /cNurul Azwan Bin Adnan3 aMaterial selection in mechanical design of car bumperh[electronic resource]  aKuantan, Pahang :bUMP ,c2009  axviii, 86 p. :bill. (some col.) ;c30 cm. + 1 computer disc  aProject paper (Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2009  aBibliography : p. 66-683 aThis study was carried out to study Material selection in mechanical design of car bumper. The objectives of this study are to perform material selection process to find the best material that can be use as car bumpers material, compare the alternative method with conventional method and use Computer-aided selection software (CES) to find the best process for car bumper manufacturing. Weight property method as alternative method and cost per unit property method as conventional method were performed to find the suitable material for car bumper. After finish selection using weight property method, cost per unit property method was performed. The material selected from these two methods was compared to find the best selected material. The materials performance index, M, were derive basic formula like stiffness and force at , and  fracture. Material performance index M, for car bumper was found to be. Function of materials performance index, was plotted on the Young’s modulus – density chart and strength – density chart. In weight property method, the material selection was made by referring to the performance index. It was found that Carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) was the best material as it has high performance index. The best selected material in cost per unit property method was Magnesium alloys (Mg Alloys) based on the smallest value of cost per unit property. However, due to limitation of cost per unit property method, result is more accurate value to several of attributes. Lastly, Computer Aided selection processes were used to find the suitable manufacturing processes for selected material. 0aMachine design  00104071a20000b20000d2019-09-04l0oTJ 230 .A99 2009 rs Bc.p0000046323r2019-09-04 00:00:00t1w2019-09-04yPSM  00104071a20000b20000d2019-09-04l0oCD 4462 | TJ 230 .A99 2009 rs Bc.p0000046324r2019-09-04 00:00:00t1w2019-09-04yPSM  aVIRTUA40c1340d1346  aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2460*2600*3000*5020*5040*5200*6500*9992