01713nam a2200217 a 4500001001400000003000700014005001700021008004100038020002200079040000800101100002300109245009600132260003400228300005800262502012000320504002600440520092700466650004101393650003401434650002701468vtls000069522KUKTEM20251114204536.0130514t2012    my da  f m    000 0 eng d  aTHE0007346(Local)  aUMP0 aMuhammad Mohd Noor10aCost reduction study of automotive part using dfa method :bcar seat  /cMuhammad Mohd Noor  aKuantan, Pahang :bUMP,c2012  axvi, 109 p. :bill. (some col.) ;c30 cm. +e1 CD-ROM  aProject paper (Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering with Automotive Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2012  aBibliography : p. 1053 aDesign for Assembly (DFA) has been widely used in industry and has produced many successes. Some of the methods known in the DFA industry now are the BoothroydDewhurst DFA method, Hitachi Assemblability Evaluation Method (AEM) and the Lucas –Hull DFA method. With these well-known methods, many important changes and developments carried out either manually or through the automatic assembly. The goals of this project are to analyse existing car seat using Boothroyd-Dewhurst DFA and Hitachi Assemblability Evaluation Method (AEM) in terms of assembly time, assembly cost and assembly efficiency. The car seat that has been used in this project is a car seat of Proton Wira. The original car seat has been analysed and showed that Boothroyd-Dewhurst DFA has low percentage design efficiency compare to Hitachi AEM DFA method. The assembly cost of both methods is same. The assembly time of both methods also calculated. 0aAutomobilesxDesign and construction 0aAutomobile industry and trade 0aProduction engineering