<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Product design simplification through DMFA methods</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Mohammad Afifuddin Abd Razak</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource manuscript="yes">text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">theses</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">my</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Kuantan, Pahang</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>UMP</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2013</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>xv, 67 p. : ill. (some col.) ; 30 cm. + 1 CD-ROM</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>DFMA is a combination between DFM and DFA. Design for manufacture  (DFM) is a systematic procedure to maximize the use of manufacturing processes in the  design of components and design for assembly (DFA) is a systematic procedure to  maximize the use of components in the design of a product. While, the term DFMA is  defined as a set of guidelines developed to ensure that a product is designed so that it  can be easily and efficiently manufactured and assembled with a minimum laborious  effort, assemble time, and cost to manufacture the product. The purpose of this project  is to reduce part count and minimize the product cost. Many of the companies outside  there were successfully used this technique for product design improvement and product  cost reduction. The aim is to propose a new design of computer desktop chassis that is  better in design efficiency, total assembly time and cost. The analysis is done by using  Boothroyd Dewhurst DFA method. For the result done by using Boothroyd-Dewhurst  DFA method, the design efficiency of original design is 6.4% while the improved  design is 15.5%. Total reduction of part from 48 parts to 16 parts after has been  redesign. The percentage of part reduction is about 66.67% from old chassis to new  chassis. The total assembly time has reduced from 462.11s to 154.5s in manual  assembly.</abstract>
  <targetAudience authority="marctarget">specialized</targetAudience>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Mohammad Afifuddin Abd Razak</note>
  <note>Project paper (Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering)-- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2013</note>
  <note>Bibliography : p. 63</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Industrial design</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Concurrent engineering</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Production planning</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Product design</topic>
  </subject>
  <identifier type="isbn">THE0007538(Local)</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">UMP</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">141121</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20251117113239.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="KUKTEM">vtls000083960</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
