02070nam a2200301 a 4500001001400000003000700014005001700021008004100038020001800079020001500097035002400112040000800136245016300144246006300307260006200370300003300432490005900465500012200524500001600646504004000662520080800702650003501510650004101545700003401586700002901620710007201649830004701721vtls000085349KUKTEM20251125100045.0150309t2013    njua   g b    000 0 eng d  a9781118890608  a1118890604  a(OCoLC)ocn871527601  aUMP00aJournal of social issues.nVol. 69, No. 4,pImpact validity as a framework for advocacy-based research /cissue editors Sean G. Massey and Ricardo E. Barreras30aImpact validity as a framework for advocacy-based research  aHoboken, NJ :bWiley Subscription Services, Inc.,c[2013]  ap. 615-803 :bill. ;c23 cm.1 aJournal of social issues,x0022-4537 ;vvol. 69, no. 4  aJournal of Social Issues is published quarterly on behalf of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues  aCover title  aIncludes bibliographical references  aThis issue introduces a new framework for thinking about research from the standpoint of usable knowledge. Impact Validity is the extent to which research has the potential to play a role in social and political change or is useful as a tool for advocacy or activism. A series of articles have been collected for this issue that exemplify the intersection of science, activism/ advocacy, and social change. These articles highlight the ways in which others have strategically grounded their research in the advocacy needs of the social/political issue they are trying to influence, and the various decisions throughout the research process that have had a bearing on its potential to be useful in addressing social problems. These decisions, which rarely receive systematic attention, take central stage 0aSocial psychologyvPeriodicals 0aSocial changexResearchvPeriodicals1 aBarreras, Ricardo E.,eeditor1 aMassey, Sean G.,eeditor2 aSociety for the Psychological Study of Social Issues,eissuing body 0aJournal of social issues ;vvol. 69, no. 4