<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03152ntm a2200361 i 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2019-11-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">FKASA .D53 2018 r Bc.</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">0000127169</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2020-09-30 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2019-11-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PSM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">10000</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2019-11-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">CD12078</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">0000127170</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2021-12-06 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2019-11-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">PSM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">91086</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">91092</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="003">MY-KuUP</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20251125105420.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">t||||fr|||| 000 0 </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">191107t20182018my a|||frm||| 000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">THE0008326(Local)</subfield>
    <subfield code="q">hardback</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UMP</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">UMP</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FKASA .D53 2018 r Bc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lee Dick Son,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">A study of bioremediationon eutrophic lakeat Kotasas lakeside /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Lee Dick Son</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Kuantan, Pahang :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">UMP,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">&#xA9; 2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xii, 72 pages :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations (some color) ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">30 cm. +</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">1 CD-ROM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">computer</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">computer disc</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text file</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">PDF</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Project Paper (Bachelors of Civil Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang &#x2013; 2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This  study  was  conducted  to  determine  the  removal  efficiency  of  nutrient  content (nitrate, NO3&#xAF;-N and phosphorus, PO43-) and ability of algae interception via different aquatic  floating  plants  which  are  Eichhornia  crassipes  (water  hyacinth)  and  Pistia stratiotes  (water  lettuce)  as  a  potential  bioremediation  strategy  at  Kotasas  Lakeside. Several parameters were analyzed in this study in order to determine the potential of these  plants,  namely  BOD5,  COD,  TSS,  turbidity,  nutrient  content  and  heavy  metals such  as  zinc  and  iron.  The  outcome  of  this  study  showed  that  water  hyacinth  has achieved  the  removal  efficiency  percentage  of  87.7%  for  BOD5,  87.9%  for  COD, 97.2%  for  TSS,  87.2%  for  turbidity,  90.9%  for  NO3&#xAF;-N,  95.7%  for  PO43-,  95.7%  for zinc and 90.8% for iron; whereas water lettuce has the removal efficiency of  55.1% for BOD5,  85.0% for COD, 75.0% for TSS, 78.0% for turbidity, 95.5% for NO3&#xAF;-N,  74.6% for PO43-, 83.0% for zinc and 79.8% for iron. However, water lettuce has shown its high accumulating  capacity  of  95.5%  reduction  in  nitrate  concentration,  which  was  more effective  than  water  lettuce  in  treating  contaminated  water  body  with  high  nitrate concentrations. This result  was  due to the attribution of larger total root surface area, high  absorption  capacity  and  photosynthesis  rate  of  water  lettuce.  Statistical  analysis were conducted on every parameters using one way ANOVA, and the results showed there were significance differences between the control sample and both aquatic plants (P&lt;0.05). Therefore, this results  point out that bioremediation technology  was  capable of  reducing  nutrient  and  heavy  metal  contents  in  contaminated  eutrophic  lake,  and water hyacinth has a higher overall removal efficiency percentage compared to water lettuce.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Universities and colleges</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Disertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Theses</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RESTRICT</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
