02813ntm a2200373 i 4500 0 0 lcc 0 1 REF 10000 10000 REF 2020-07-09 0 FKASA .A343 2019 r Bc. T000000731 2022-04-14 00:00:00 1 2020-07-09 PSM 0 0 lcc 0 6 REF 10000 10000 2020-07-09 0 CD12593 T000000732 2020-07-09 00:00:00 1 2020-07-09 PSM 92555 92561 MY-KuUP 20251125105551.0 t||||fr|||| 000 0 ta 200709t20192019my a|||fram|| 001 0 eng d THE0008721(Local) hardback UMP eng UMP rda FKASA .A343 2019 r Bc. Putri Aifa Syuhaida Shabuddin, author. Risk assessment of public road construction projects using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) / Putri Aifa Syuhaida Shabuddin Kuantan, Pahang : UMP, 2019 © 2019 xi, 59 pages : illustrations (some color) ; 30 cm. + 1 CD-ROM text rdacontent text rdacontent unmediated rdamedia computer rdamedia volume rdacarrier computer disc rdacarrier text file PDF rda Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources Project Paper (Bachelors of Civil Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2019 Includes bibliographical references Highways or road construction project are one of the public infrastructure project that are important for social economic development. Due to this reason Malaysia government paying much more attention to these projects. Even though appropriate measurement taken, there is still great probability of risk to occur which places the road construction project at risk of cost, time overruns and poor quality delivery. The aim of this study was to analyze the risk assessment of public road construction projects. The factors and sub-factors of risk in public road construction project were scrutinized from the literature review. The designate pair-wise questionnaire survey was distributed to the road engineering section of public work department, road contractors and road concessionaires in accordance with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This study identified the most prioritized risk factors as follows: economic and financial (0.267), technical (0.165), organizational (0.148), contractual (0.130), natural hazard (0.125), socio and politic (0.086) and resources (0.079). The risk sub-factors were also ranked and the top five sub-factors were determined as follows: flood (0.633), inflation risk (0.561), changes in government law and regulation (0.543), lack coordination between parties (0.467), fund risk (0.439). It is expected that the data presented in this study can be used to strategically select elements for risk monitoring on the prioritization risk. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources Disertations Universities and colleges Disertations Theses lcc PSM