<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Performance study on co-gasification of coal with sawdust and sawdust pellet in downdraft gasifier</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Fatin Zafirah Mansur</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource manuscript="yes">text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">theses</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">my</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>xx, 254 pages : illustrations (some color) ; 30 cm. + 1 CD ROM</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Gasification is a thermochemical conversion technology in which complex organic fuels  are  converted  into  syngas  that  are  used  to  generate  energy  in  the  presence  of  limited  oxygen  supplied  by  steam  or  air.  A  decline  in  coal  resources  and  environmental  deterioration  coupled  with  a  high  pre-processing  cost  and  tar  formation  are  usually  associated with coal and biomass gasification. Thus, the co-gasification of biomass and  coal is an alternative approach that facilitates a trade-off between renewable and nonrenewable resources. However, low energy density, high moisture content and different  decomposition behaviours serve as technical barriers to co-gasification. This study aimed  to compare raw biomass and pre-treated biomass co-gasified with coal to investigate pretreated biomass’s reliability in enhancing gasification performance. Sawdust (SD) and  sawdust pellets (SDP) as well as the blends of these two feedstocks with sub-bituminous  coal  (CL)  were  investigated.  Feedstock  properties,  like  structural  analysis,  proximate  analysis,  ultimate  analysis,  higher  heating  value,  chemical  composition  etc.  were  determined for CL, SD, and SDP and coal-biomass mixtures at different ratios (20%, 50%  and 75%). Properties of the sawdust showed improvement as the feedstock was pelletized.  Moreover, the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed in an air environment  to study thermal behaviour and this study adopted the Kissinger, Flynn-Wall-Ozawa and  Distribution Activation Energy Model methods to measure the kinetic analysis. Results  show that lower activation energy (Ea) for CL/SD (103.82 ± 4.39 kJ/mol) and CL/SDP  (88.79 ± 18.56 kJ/mol) was found at 75% coal ratio. There is also positive synergy for  both CL/SD and CL/SDP employed by the three models. The addition of CL enhances  the degradation of SD and SDP, increase the ΔEa, lower the Ea  and indicates a reactive  reaction.  It  was  found  that  SD  possessed  a  higher  ΔEa  than  SDP,  with  an  average  difference of 14%, 23% and 38% at blending ratios of 75%, 50% and 25%, respectively.  Furthermore, mixtures of CL with SD and SDP were gasified in a down-draft fixed bed  gasifier to quantify the effect of coal ratio, gasification temperature and equivalence ratio  of the air (ERair) on the gaseous concentration (H2, CO, CO2  and CH4), syngas higher  heating  value  (HHVsyngas),  syngas  yield  (Ysyngas),  carbon  conversion  efficiency  (ηCCE),  cold  gas  efficiency  (ηCGE)  and  solid-gas  conversion  efficiency  (ηSGC).  The  parametric  investigation as well as the optimum condition for maximizing H2  and CO were evaluated  by adopting the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) method and sensitivity analysis  using  the  ASPEN  Plus model.  Findings  from  both  parametric  approaches  are  similar,  indicating that with an increase in gasification temperature, the production of gaseous  composition, mainly the H2  and CO, also increases while enhancing the HHVsyngas, Ysyngas,  ηCCE and ηCGE. Moreover, the highest content of H2, CO and CH4 is also associated with  a lower ERair, thus, improving the HHVsyngas. Meanwhile, for the maximum production of  CO2, Ysyngas  and ηCCE, a higher ERair  is favourable. It was found that the best conditions  determined by  RSM-CCD are much more specific than that indicated by the simulation  model due to steady-state assumption in the simulation model and neglecting the heat and  mass transfer inside the gasifiers. Instead, both the optimum parameters are within the  range in which CL/SD favours a high coal ratio (75 %) and CL/SDP favours a lesser coal  ratio  (50-61  %)  at  a  high  gasification  temperature  and  low  ERair  for  the  maximum  production of H2  (12.30  -14.07 %), CO (14.63  -16.47 %) and HHVsyngas  (5.74 to 6.66  MJ/kg).  The  RSM-CCD  method  resulted  lesser  percentage  error  (0.8-3.5%)  than  the  simulation model (8.0-12.57%) when compared with the experimental study under the  most  conducive  conditions.  Therefore,  co-gasified  CL  with  SDP  can  potentially  be  a  substitute for SD with the minimum amount of CL for similar gasification performances.</abstract>
  <targetAudience authority="marctarget">specialized</targetAudience>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Fatin Zafirah Mansur</note>
  <note>Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering Technology</note>
  <note>Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2020</note>
  <note>Includes bibliographical references</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <name type="corporate">
      <namePart>Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering Technology</namePart>
    </name>
    <topic>Dissertations</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Universities and colleges</topic>
    <topic>Dissertations</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Theses</topic>
  </subject>
  <identifier type="isbn">THE0009145(Local)</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">UMP</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">220310</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20251125105845.0</recordChangeDate>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
