<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Psychosocial risk factors and work performance of chemical manufacturing industry workers</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Nuruzzakiyah Mohd Ishanuddin</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource manuscript="yes">text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">theses</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">my</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2021</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>xv, 178 pages : illustrations ; 30 cm. + 1 CD-ROM</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>The deterioration of mental health well-being  among the  working population  has  become  an issue recently.  One  of the  possible assumptions  regarding this issue is the existent of  psychosocial risk at the workplace.  This particular risk can  induce  a  worker's negative  physical and emotional state, which can lead to poor work performance. Thus, tending to  research on psychosocial risk is significant at the workplace.  In association with that, in  the Malaysian working context, the manufacturing sector was recorded as the prominent  industry  with  an  alarming  occurrence  of  occupational  accidents  compared  to  other  industries.  This  notable  statistic  led  to  the  assumption  of  the  potential  existent  of  psychosocial  risk  to  be  one  of  the  contributing  risk  factors  to  the  occurrence  of  occupational  accidents  in  the  manufacturing  plant.  Considering  there  was  limited established instrument to  investigate  the psychosocial risk factors incorporated with work  performance factors,  an instrument was developed.  This study  aim to  investigates  the  correlation between two main variables: psychosocial risk factors and work performance  factors  other than to determine significant risk factors that can affect the workers wellbeing  at work.  A questionnaire was made by adapting and adopting the construct from  three  different  generic  questionnaires.  The  validity  and  reliability  were  tested  to  the questionnaire  that  was  adapted  and  adopted  from  Copenhagen  Psychosocial  Questionnaire (COPSOQ III), NIOSH Generic Job Stress Questionnaire, and Individual  Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ 1.0). Then, it was tested  for construct validity using  Exploratory  Factor  Analysis  (EFA).  The  results  showed  that  the  identified  ten  psychosocial  risk  factors  and  work  performance  were  reduced  into  eight  factors understudy  after  conducting  factor  analysis  by  Principal  Component  Analysis  as  a  dimensional reduction method. Besides,  using mean analysis  and Kruskal-Wallis test to  determine the significant psychosocial risk factors present in a manufacturing plant. The  risk factors presented include the workers perceived as having high job demand (Mean=  3.42). However, job  control (Mean= 2.95)  and job content  (Mean=3.21) were somehow  at  a  moderate  level.  While,  career  development  (Mean=4.03),  interpersonal  (Mean=  4.07), and environmental (Mean=2.52) factors were notably as good among the workers.  Besides, both task and contextual performance (Mean= 3.73) are considered as excellent  as well with minimal negative work behaviour  (Mean= 1.86).  Next, the significant factors  that were significantly different with work performance factors include Interpersonal (p  =0.07), Job control (p= 0.008), Career development (p= 0.000), Environment (p= 0.000)  and  Job  content  (p=  0.001).  Then,  The  correlation  analysis  was  tested  between  psychosocial  factors  and work performance  factors  using Spearman’s rho.  Meanwhile,  the  significant  factors  that  were  associated  with  work  performance  factors  were  Interpersonal (r =0.152, p &lt;0.05), Career development (r =0.243, p &lt; 0.05), Environment  (r = 0.237, p &lt; 0.05), and Job demands (r =0.200, p &lt; 0.05).  This shows that there was a  weak  positive  correlation  (r  =  0.1-0.39)  between  psychosocial  risk  factors  and  work  performance at a 0.05 level of significance. In sum, this study provides baseline data for  future  research  purposes  regarding  psychosocial  risk  factors  that  incorporated  work  performance in the study</abstract>
  <targetAudience authority="marctarget">specialized</targetAudience>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Nuruzzakiyah Mohd Ishanuddin</note>
  <note>Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology</note>
  <note>Thesis (Master of Science ) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2021</note>
  <note>Includes bibliographical references</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <name type="corporate">
      <namePart>Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology</namePart>
    </name>
    <topic>Dissertations</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Universities and colleges</topic>
    <topic>Dissertations</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Theses</topic>
  </subject>
  <identifier type="isbn">THE0009181(Local)</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">UMP</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">220324</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20251125110000.0</recordChangeDate>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
