<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04364ntm a2200373 i 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">20000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">20000</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2022-04-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">FTKMA .V67 2021 r Thesis</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T000001860</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2022-06-09 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2022-04-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">THESIS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">20000</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">20000</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2022-04-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">CD13096</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">T000001861</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2022-04-18 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2022-04-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">THESIS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">97057</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">97063</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="003">MY-KuUP</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20251125110037.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">t||||fr|||| 000 0 </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">220418s2021    my a|||frm||| 000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">THE0009339(Local)</subfield>
    <subfield code="q">hardback</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UMP</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">UMP</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FTKMA .V67 2021 r Thesis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Vorathin Epin,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Accuracy improvement of rubber-based diaphragm fibre bragg grating pressure sensors /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Vorathin Epin</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Kuantan, Pahang :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">UMP,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2021</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">&#xA9; 2020</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">xx, 205 pages :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">illustrations (some color) ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">30 cm. +</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">1 CD ROM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">computer</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">computer disc</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text file</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">PDF</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Technology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang &#x2013; 2021</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Water level sensing has  become a great  importance  in various industrial applications.  Due  to  its  advantages,  fibre  Bragg  grating  (FBG)  pressure  sensor  has  been  introduced  to  overcome the drawbacks  of electrical pressure sensor for hydrostatic pressure  based water  level sensing.  Over the years, various studies  have been reported on the use of rubberbased diaphragms  to increase the pressure sensitivity of the bare FBG pressure sensors.  However, high thermal  expansion of the rubber  material is making the FBG pressure  sensors  more  sensitive  to  the  temperature  effects  due  to  the  increased  temperature  sensitivity.  This drawback can result  in inaccuracy of the  pressure sensors. Therefore, the  main objective of this study is to eliminate the temperature sensitivity  in order to improve  the accuracy of the rubber-based diaphragm FBG pressure sensors.  Here, four types of  pressure sensors  were developed to investigate the temperature effects. Type I pressure  sensor was simply by bonding the bare FBG on rubber diaphragm without temperature  compensation.  Type  II  pressure  sensor  was  similar  to  type  I  but  with  reference  FBG  temperature compensation technique. Type III and type IV pressure sensors  were based  on  differential  FBG  and  bandwidth  modulation  technique.  All  pressure  sensors  underwent pressure and temperature variations. Under pressure variation across 20 kPa,  all the pressure sensors obtained high pressure sensitivity at 274.8 pm/kPa, 275.0 pm/kPa,  641.9 pm/kPa and -275.1 pm/kPa. Besides, type IV pressure sensor is also capable to be  monitored using photodetector (PD) with the pressure sensitivity of -12.1  mV/kPa. Under  temperature  variation  across  50  &#xB0;C,  all  pressure  sensors  obtained  high  temperature  sensitivity  of  more  than  44.0  pm/&#xB0;C  when  monitored  based  on  single  wavelength.  However, the differential FBG and bandwidth modulation techniques obtained negligible average  temperature  sensitivity  at  only  0.5  pm/&#xB0;C  and  -0.3  pm/&#xB0;C.  Due  to  this,  the  measured pressure and water level using type I and type II pressure sensors was far off  from the actual readings with the percentage of error at 35% and 16.55%. Type III and  type IV pressure sensors obtained an  average highest percentage of accuracy error at only  3.24%  and  5.51%.  This  is  because  the  temperature  effects  have  no  influence  on  temperature  insensitive  pressure  sensors.  As  a  conclusion,  the  findings  of  this  study  shows that the use of rubber diaphragm with differential FBG and bandwidth modulation  techniques  capable  to  eliminate  away  the  temperature  sensitivity  and  retain  the  high  pressure sensitivity of the pressure sensors. The temperature-independent high pressure  sensitivity characteristics enabled the pressure sensors to be used for low pressure sensing  in the fields of hydrology, agriculture, food processing and water supply system with  better accuracy and reducing false information</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Faculty of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Technology</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Universities and colleges</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Dissertations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Theses</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">THESIS</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
