000 02574nam a2200253 a 4500
001 vtls000040606
003 KUKTEM
005 20251114204415.0
008 090720t2008 my a f m 001 0 eng|d
020 _aTHE0005487(Local)
039 9 _a201905160930
_bhanafiah
_c201107132231
_dVLOAD
_c200908141650
_dVLOAD
_c200908141630
_dVLOAD
_y200907201550
_zida84
040 _aUMP
090 _aQA76.758 .A75 2008 rs Bc.
100 0 _aAhmad Arif Syazni Abd Rahman
245 1 0 _aSoftware development by integrating the integrated effort flow analysis and boothroyd - DFA /
_cAhmad Arif Syazni Abd Rahman
246 3 _aSoftware development by integrating the integrated effort flow analysis and boothroyd - DFA
_h[electronic resource]
260 _aKuantan, Pahang :
_bUMP,
_c2008
300 _a106 p. :
_bill. (some col.) ;
_c30 cm. +
_e1 computer disc
502 _aProject paper (Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering with Manufacturing) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2008
520 3 _aThis work proposed a framework to develop the software base on the integration of EFA and DFA by using Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0. This software can help the designer to design product easier compare manual designer. The expected output is software that able to aid the designer to create an opportunity to manufacturing of product with low assembly cost and labour time saving. Effort Flow Analysis uses an effort flow diagram to model a product as a connected set of nodes and links. The nodes represent the components of the product and the links represent the interfaces between the components can be show in this software. Part count reduction through part combination is a recognized goal of design for assembly (DFA). The benefits of part count reduction are: a reduced the number of assembly operations, reduced procurement costs, cycle time reduction, supply chain reduction, and higher potential profits. In this software, if the interaction between two components has been show and can combine if the interaction between components follows relation motion guideline. The selected case study of can opener has been selected by using this software and for pen and nail clipper is selected for comparison between this software and DFMA software. From comparison between this software and DFMA software has prove that the efficiency is closed different and this software is valid in terms of its result.
650 0 _aProduct design
_xComputer programs
650 0 _aSoftware engineering
999 _aVIRTUA40
_c1497
_d1503
999 _aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2460*2600*3000*5020*5200*6500*6501*9992