000 02043nam a2200253 a 4500
001 vtls000051798
003 KUKTEM
005 20251114204440.0
008 110309t2010 my da f m 000 0 eng d
020 _aTHE0006372(Local)
039 9 _a201905131304
_bamirul
_c201703141355
_dida
_c201110041219
_dFida
_c201107140037
_dVLOAD
_y201103091406
_zida
040 _aUMP
090 _aTJ797 .M85 2010 rs Bc.
100 0 _aWan Muhammad Mukhlis Wan Ab Latif
245 1 0 _aNumerical simulation of liquid atomisation /
_cWan Muhammad Mukhlis Wan Ab Latif
246 3 _aNumerical simulation of liquid atomisation
_h[computer file]
260 _aKuantan, Pahang :
_bUMP,
_c2010
300 _ax, 27p. :
_bill. (some col.) ;
_c30 cm. +
_e1 computer disc
502 _aProject paper (Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering with Automotive Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2010
504 _aBibliography : p. [28]
520 3 _aThe focus of this study was to investigate the spray characteristics and atomization performance of gasoline fuel (G100) and ethanol fuel (E100) in a high pressure chamber. The overall spray and atomization characteristics such as an axial spray tip penetration, spray width, and overall SMD were measured experimentally and predicted by using ANSYS Fluent. The development process and the appearance timing of the vortices in the test fuels were very similar. Moreover, the increased injection pressure induced the occurrence of a clear circular shape in the downstream spray and a uniform mixture between the injected spray droplets and ambient air. The axial spray tip penetrations of the test fuels were similar, while the spray width and spray cone angle of G100 were slightly larger than the other fuels. In terms of atomization performance, the E100 fuel among the tested fuels had the largest droplet size because E100 has a high kinematic viscosity and surface tension
650 0 _aDiesel motor
_xFuel systems
999 _aVIRTUA40
_c2210
_d2216
999 _aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2460*2600*3000*5020*5040*5200*6500*9992