000 02499nam a2200265 a 4500
001 vtls000065577
003 KUKTEM
005 20251114204522.0
008 121102t2012 my da f m 000 0 eng d
020 _aTHE0006526(Local)
039 9 _a201905141454
_bamirul
_c201211081208
_dhuda
_c201211021601
_dhuda
_y201211021600
_zhuda
040 _aUMP
090 _aTJ1185 .Z87 2012 rs Bc.
100 0 _aZuraifah Kamarudin
245 1 0 _aMachinability study on drilling austenite stainless steel 316l1 using minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on surface roughness /
_cZuraifah Kamarudin
260 _aKuantan, Pahang :
_bUMP ,
_c2012
300 _axiii, 44 p. :
_bill. (some col.) ;
_c30 cm. +
_e1 CD-ROM
502 _aProject paper (Bachelor of Manufacturing Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2012
504 _aBibliography : p. 42-44
520 _aThis research was carried out to determine the optimum condition of cutting speed, feed rate and point of angle while drilling the austenite stainless steel in order to get the good surface finish by using Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL). This project focuses on the drilling small hole on the austenite stainless steel by using milling machine. The aim of this project is to find the optimum condition in producing the good surface finish in drilling process with MQL. The Taguchi OA from software Minitab 16 was used to formulate the experiment, to analyze the three factors and also to predict the optimal choices of the drilling parameters. The selected cutting speeds for the drilling process are 15m/min, 25m/min and 35m/min. For the feed rate, the parameters are 0.1mm/rev, 0.15mm/rev and 0.2mm/rev. The third parameter that will be considered in this project is point of angle, and the parameters that will be used are about 110°, 120° and 135°. The machining processes were performed on the CNC milling machine. The surface roughness will be test by using Surfcom 130A. Results shows that, the best surface roughness were obtained at the lower cutting speed, middle of feed rate and middle of point of angle. So, the optimum cutting speed, feed rate and point of angle are, 15m/min, 0.15mm/rev and 120°. The confirmation results show that, the predicted values and the measured values are quite close to each other.
650 0 _aMetals
_xMachinability
650 0 _aAustenitic stainless steel
650 0 _aAustenite
999 _aVIRTUA40
_c3432
_d3438
999 _aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2600*3000*5020*5040*5200*6500*6501*6502*9992