000 02673nam a2200289 a 4500
001 vtls000067034
003 KUKTEM
005 20251114204530.0
008 121128t2012 my da f m 000 0 eng d
020 _aTHE0007651(Local)
039 9 _a201905171209
_bfawwaz
_c201212051028
_dhuda
_y201211281021
_zhuda
040 _aUMP
090 _aTS178.4 .R39 2012 rs Bc.
100 0 _aMohd Raz Firdaus Ramli
245 1 0 _aDesign improvement of coffee maker using design for assembly (DFA) method /
_cMohd Raz Firdaus Ramli
260 _aKuantan, Pahang :
_bUMP,
_c2012
300 _axiii, 64 p. :
_bill. (some col.);
_c30 cm. +
_e1 CD-ROM
502 _aProject paper (Bachelor of Manufacturing Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2012
504 _aBibliography : p. 53-54
520 3 _aNowadays companies especially manufacturer trying to cut down the manufacturing cost by improved and adjusted the manufacturing process and assembly method and at the same time increase their profit. In order to be a competent player in the market, the product should arrive into market within a short time and reasonable price. This study basically shows a detailed study to improve the design of Coffee Maker by using Design for Assembly and also studies the assembly efficiency using Boothroyd Dewhurst Design for Assembly (DFA) method. Assembly cost is one of the major operations in manufacturing but always ignored during designing stage. In this study, comparative analysis was done between current and alternative design. The design was done by using CATIA software and analysed by using manual and DFA software analysis to get the efficiency of current design. By applying Boothroyd Dewhurst DFA method guideline, alternative design was generated and analysed using the same method to compare the effectiveness of this new alternative design focuses on part that has been identified for improvement. From the result, it was found that the assembly cost was decreased from 117.49 second into 92.59 second after reduction from 14 parts into 11 parts. It was proven that this Boothroyd Dewhurst DFA method was able to improve the design in terms of design efficiency where the current design efficiency is 5.1% and for proposed design the efficiency became 6.3%. This method can be applied in manufacturing company in order to improve their design effectiveness.
650 0 _aProduction engineering
650 0 _aNew products
650 0 _aMachine-tools
_xDesign and construction
650 0 _aAssembly- line methods
650 0 _aProduction planning
999 _aVIRTUA40
_c3656
_d3662
999 _aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2600*3000*5020*5040*5200*6500*6501*6502*6503*6504*9992