000			01969ntm a2200241 a 4500
001			vtls000079805
003			KUKTEM
005			20251114204614.0
008			140605t2013 my a f m 000 0 eng d
020			_aTHE0006254(Local)
039		9	_a201905161432 _baida _c201406061102 _dtraining2 _c201406060929 _dFida _c201406051054 _dtraining2 _y201406050856 _ztraining2
040			_aUMP
090			_aTJ263 .L34 2013 rs Bc.
100	1		_aLagunesvary Ganesan
245	1	0	_aHeat exchanger for solar collector / _cLagunesvary Ganesan
260			_aKuantan, Pahang : _bUMP, _c2013
300			_axvii, 91 p. : _bill. (some col.) ; _c30 cm. + _e1 CD-ROM
502			_aProject paper (Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2013
504			_aBibliography : p. 67-69
520	3		_aThe objective of this study is to design and simulate an optimum heat exchanger for evacuated tube solar collector. The simulation was carried out in ANSYS FLUENT 14.0 with two different tube designs, spring and S-Shape. Four materials was analysed in this study, copper, aluminium, steel and brass. Both tube designs are varied by three different sizes and four shapes, circular, ellipse, square and hexagon. There are four flow rates are considered in the study, 1kg/s, 0.5kg/s, 0.25kg/s and 0.01kg/s. Based on the study, copper 61.25% effective compare to aluminium and followed by steel and brass. In the overall, spring design performs better than S-Shape design and ellipse shape tube in leading. At the flow rate of 1kg/s, large size ellipse-spring tube design provide higher performance with rate of heat transfer 109192.02W. At flow rate of 0.5kg/s and 0.25kg/s medium size ellipse-spring tube design performs better than the others. While at the flow rate of 0.01kg/s, small size ellipse-S-Shape design is chosen.
650		0	_aHeat exchangers _xDesign and construction
999			_aVIRTUA40 _c4942 _d4948
999			_aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2600*3000*5020*5040*5200*6500*9992