MARC View

000			03693ntm a2200289 a 4500
001			vtls000092110
003			KUKTEM
005			20251117113312.0
008			151118t2015 my da f abm 000 0 eng d
020			_aTHE0000593(Local)
039		9	_a201905161013 _bnazirah _c201711291525 _dfateeha _y201511181243 _zasma
040			_aUMP
090			_aFKASA .N39 2015 r Bc.
100	0		_aNazratul Izzana Ishak
245	1	0	_aStudy of deserted construction projects in Malaysia / _cNazratul Izzana Ishak
260			_aKuantan, Pahang : _bUMP, _c2015
300			_axiv, 130 p. : _bill. (some col.) ; _c30 cm. + _e1 CD ROM
500			_aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources
502			_aProject Paper (Bachelors of Civil Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2015
504			_aBibliography : p. 113-122
520	3		_aOne of the most significant sectors that contribute to Malaysia's economic growth is the construction industries and it supplies a great deal of opportunities to whom involved to flourish in this sector. Even so, deserted construction project (DCP) in Malaysia is considered as one of the most usual and serious problems existing in construction industry nowadays. The desertion of construction projects has resulted in many adverse consequences to the economic system, society and towards environment. This study suggests to identify the reasons that contribute to this problem in order to bring down the negative impact of DCP, and try to determine how to prevent DCP from happen again. Respondents selected for this study were from Class B Contractors to Class A Contractors in peninsular Malaysia that were listed in the current Construction Industry Development Board(CIDB) directory. 170 sets of questionnaires were distributed and 122 questionnaires were returned for further analyses. Foremost, the issues skirting the problem and existing literature on the reasons of DCP are reexamined. Besides, potential reasons of the DCP are also reviewed and summed up into 41 items to be rated in an industry wide questionnaire survey. An open-ended question were also included in the questionnaire to resolve DCP. Afterward, a series of ten semi-structured interviews were conducted to getting detailed opinions from experienced players in the industry concerning the reasons of DCP and how to solve the problems. The interviewees include architects, developers, property consultants, the honorary secretary general of the National House Buyers Association etc. to ensure a comprehensive view was obtained. Quantitative analyses include ranking of the 41 possible reasons of DCP with Spearman‟s ranking correlation between different groups of respondents, and factor analysis with Cronbach‟s α reliability analysis. Qualitative analyses include organizing the results of the open ended question and results of the semi-structured interviews. The discussions included interpret basic factors got from factor analysis based on the outcomes of the qualitative. The outcomes indicated that the owner is mainly responsible for DCP (i.e. cash flow problems, incompetence, siphoning out of money, etc.), followed by the role of government regulations. A risk management expert system module within BIM, a middle ground solution between the sell-then-build and build-then-sell schemes, and others are proposed
610	2	0	_aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources _xDissertations
650		0	_aUniversities and Colleges _xDissertations
650		0	_aTheses
856	4	0	_uhttp://ecollib.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/25567 _zAccess in library only
999			_aVIRTUA40 _c6379 _d6385
999			_aVTLSSORT00800200040009001000245026003000500050205040520061006500650185609992