000 04389nam a2200289 a 4500
001 vtls000094134
003 KUKTEM
005 20251117113316.0
008 160325t2015 my da ab m 000 0 eng d
020 _aTHE0005471(Local)
039 9 _a201905151740
_bhanafiah
_c201710161638
_daishah
_y201603251656
_zshima
040 _aUMP
090 _aPBMSK .U45 2015 r Thesis
100 0 _aUmi Kalsom Masrom
245 1 0 _aThe effects of task complexity on the complexity of language production and task motivation in asynchronous computer-mediated communication (ACMC) environment /
_cUmi Kalsom Masrom
260 _aKuantan, Pahang :
_bUMP,
_c2015
300 _axxi, 262 p. :
_bill. col. ;
_c30 cm. +
_e1 CD-ROM
500 _aCentre for Modern Languages and Human Sciences
502 _aThesis (Doctor of Philosophy) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2015
504 _aBibliography : p. 204-226
520 3 _aThis study investigates the effects of manipulating the cognitive demands of task complexity, on the complexity of learner language production using task-based instruction during asynchronous computer-mediated communication (ACMC) writing tasks. The study also intends to examine the effects of manipulating task complexity on leaners‘ task motivation. Finally, the current study seeks to explore the relationship between the complexity of language production and task motivation when task complexity was manipulated. This study draws on the construct of cognitive complexity from Robinson‘s Cognition Hypothesis (Robinson 2001a, 2003a, 2003b, 2005, 2007a, 2007b) which predicts that more cognitively complex tasks along resource-directing dimension and simpler tasks on resource-dispersing dimension will lead to a greater complexity of language production. However, research on the effects of manipulating task complexity along both resource-directing and resource-dispersing dimensions is so far inconclusive. The current study sought to fill this gap based on Cognition Hypothesis, by looking at the synergistic effects of increases and decreases task complexity on written language production and task motivation. The participants were 88 engineering learners at a technical university in Malaysia who enrolled in English for Professional Communication course. The participants were placed in four separate groups that were categorized as follows; i) with causal reasoning demand (+CRD), ii) without causal reasoning demand (–CRD), iii) with task structure (+TS), and iv) without task structure (–TS). Each learner engaged in a one-hour session of a writing task for which they had to write an essay on Wiki on miscommunication issues at the workplace. After the participants completed the writing tasks, they were asked to complete a questionnaire to gauge their motivation towards the tasks and several participants from each group were interviewed. The statistics from the essay writing and input from the questionnaire served as the data in the current study. The essay writings were saved and analysed to determine the role of these task implementation features on the complexity of language production. The complexity of the language was analysed using two measures: syntactic complexity (i.e. T-unit complexity ratio, sentence complexity ratio, dependent clause ratio and dependent clause per T-unit) and lexical complexity (i.e. word type ratio, Guiraud Index and lexical sophistication). Results showed that the two implementation features (+/- CRD and +/- TS) influenced the complexity of the language production. The findings on the effect of task complexity on task motivation demonstrated that neither the reasoning demand nor the task structure affected learners‘ motivation towards the task. The findings on the relationship between task complexity and task motivation revealed a significant correlation between manipulating the cognitive demand of a task and the lexical production of the language. However, no correlation was found between task complexity and syntactic complexity of language production.
610 2 0 _aCentre for Modern Languages and Human Sciences
_xDissertations
650 0 _aUniversities and Colleges
_xDissertations
650 0 _aTheses
856 4 0 _uhttp://ecollib.ump.edu.my/3533/
_zLibrary access only
999 _aVIRTUA40
_c6488
_d6494
999 _aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2600*3000*5000*5020*5040*5200*6100*6500*6501*8560*9992