000 02912ntm a2200289 a 4500
001 vtls000099591
003 KUKTEM
005 20251117113327.0
008 170427t2017 my daolf 0 0 00eng d
020 _aTHE0000753(Local)
039 9 _a201905161556
_bnazirah
_c201712061252
_dhuda
_y201704271204
_zzul
040 _aUMP
090 _aFKASA .T3694 2017 r Bc.
100 0 _aTam, Weng Loong
245 1 0 _aGeotechnical and morphological properties of row and prosessed Bukit Goh bauxite /
_cby Tam Weng Loong
260 _aKuantan, Pahang :
_bUMP,
_c2017
300 _axvi, 65 p. :
_bill. (some col.) ;
_c30 cm. +
_e1 CD ROM
500 _aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources
502 _aProject Paper (Bachelors of Civil Engineering) -- University Malaysia Pahang – 2017
504 _aBibliography : p. 64-65
520 3 _aThis study focus on the differences of geotechnical properties between raw and processed Bukit Goh bauxite. As bauxite material has high clay content which mostly composed of silicate minerals, it has high risk to cause cargo liquefaction which in turn causes catastrophic incident. This paper includes the analysis of raw and processed bauxite where its fine particle contents has been minimized using beneficiation method to reduce the risk of liquefaction by referring to the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes Code (IMSBC Code) standard. To analyze these characteristics of the bauxite, five samples were selected at Bukit Goh, Kuantan; three of the samples from the Bukit Goh mine and two samples from stock pile were tested to identify the bauxite geotechnical properties by referring to GEOSPEC 3: Model Specification for Soil Testing; particle size distribution, moisture content, specific gravity, morphological properties as well as its elemental and oxide properties. Laboratory tests involved including Small Pycnometer test, Dry Sieve test, Specific Gravity test, X-ray fluorescence test (XRF) and Field emission scanning electron microscopy test (FESEM). The results show that average moisture content of raw bauxite is 24.81% which exceeded the recommended value of maximum 10% while the average moisture content of processed bauxite is only 6.69%. The average fine material for raw bauxite is 38.40% which should not be greater than 30% per IMSBC standard while for processed bauxite is 21.40%. From the FESEM image, it was clearly shown that the fine particles of processed bauxite is lesser than raw bauxite. In conclusion, the quality and safety of processed bauxite is better than raw bauxite.
610 2 0 _aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources
_xDissertations
650 0 _aUniversities and Colleges
_xDissertations
650 0 _aTheses
856 4 0 _uhttp://ecollib.ump.edu.my/25720/
_zAccess in library only
999 _aVIRTUA40
_c6789
_d6795
999 _aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2600*3000*5000*5020*5040*5200*6100*6500*6501*8560*9992