000			02186ntm a2200289 a 4500
001			vtls000101044
003			KUKTEM
005			20251117113348.0
008			170822t2017 my a f am 000 0 eng d
020			_aTHE0001431(Local)
039		9	_a201905211442 _basmadi _c201712261112 _dnazri _c201708221506 _dnazri _y201708221103 _znazri
040			_aUMP
090			_aFTeK .T369 2017 r Bc.
100	1		_aTan, Zhen Sheng
245	1	0	_aEffect of temperature on task performance and thermal comfort among undergraduates of UMP / _cTan Zhen Sheng
260			_aKuantan, Pahang : _bUMP, _c2017
300			_axi, 58 p. : _bill. (some col.) ; _c30 cm. + _e1 CD ROM
500			_aFaculty of Engineering Technology
502			_aProject Paper (Bachelor of Occupational Safety & Health) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2017
504			_aBibliography : p. 50-52
520	3		_aIndoor air temperature may negatively affect human performance rate and human physical response if it is not properly controlled. Effects of indoor air temperature on task performance and its contribution to the occurrence of thermal comfort had become a focus of studies. However, until now inconsistent results were yielded from those studies. In this paper, the relationship between the thermal comfort and task performance was discussed, as well as the thermal comfort among respondents. Typing test was used as an indicator of evaluating task performance. ASHRAE Thermal Sensation Scale was also used to evaluate the range of acceptance temperature. Based on the result, 23°C is the most comfortable temperature and most accepted. In conclusion, the study showed that thermal comfort (p<0.05) and task performance (p<0.05) were significantly difference under different temperature settings, but thermal comfort did not show any relationship with task performance (p>0.01).
610	2	0	_aFaculty of Engineering Technology _xDissertations
650		0	_aUniversities and Colleges _xDissertations
650		0	_aTheses
856	4	0	_u http://ecollib.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/27980 _zAccess in library only
999			_aVIRTUA40 _c7378 _d7384
999			_aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2600*3000*5000*5020*5040*5200*6100*6500*6501*8560*9992