000 02436nam a2200253 a 4500
001 vtls000052281
003 KUKTEM
005 20251114204353.0
008 110324t2010 my a f m 000 0 eng d
020 _aTHE0006041(Local)
039 9 _a201905151227
_baida
_c201107132058
_dVLOAD
_y201103241624
_zida
040 _aUMP
090 _aTJ163.5.B84 F57 2010 rs Bc.
100 0 _aMohd Firdaus Musa
245 1 0 _aBuilding energy analysis using cooling load factor/cooling load temperature different (CLF/CLTD) /
_cMohd Firdaus Musa
246 3 _aBuilding energy analysis using cooling load factor/cooling load temperature different (CLF/CLTD)
_h[electronic resource]
260 _aKuantan, Pahang :
_bUMP,
_c2010
300 _axiv, 74 p. :
_bill. (some col.) ;
_c30 cm.+
_e2 computer disc
502 _aProject paper (Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang - 2010
504 _aBibliography : p. 39-40
520 3 _aThis project is carried out to indentify whether the existing cooling capacity is suffice for an occupied building. The first objective of this project is to determine the heat gain of FKM Administration Building when it’s fully occupied. The second objective of this project is to compare the calculated heat gain against the existing cooling capacity. FKM Administration Building was chosen as the case study. The architectural drawing of FKM Administration Building is first studied to review the building specifications. The building specification is used in the calculation of heat gain in order to identify the cooling load required for FKM Administration Building. When FKM Administration Building is fully occupied, the number of occupant will be around 396 peoples. The type of air-conditioning system used in FKM Administration Building is central air conditioning system and the total existing cooling load is observed to be 381.8 kW. The peak heat gain is calculated as 492.7 kW using Cooling Load Factor/ Cooling Load Temperature Difference (CLF/CLTD) method at 4 pm. Therefore, the existing cooling load is observed to be undersized in design. However, the peak heat gain will only happen occasionally throughout the year. In order to overcome the undersized design cooling capacity problem, the cooling capacity should increase 29%.
650 0 _aBuilding
_xEnergy conservation
999 _aVIRTUA40
_c865
_d871
999 _aVTLSSORT0080*0200*0400*0900*1000*2450*2460*2600*3000*5020*5040*5200*6500*9992