000			03361ntm a2200373 i 4500
999			_c90814 _d90820
003			MY-KuUP
005			20251125105359.0
006			t||||fr|||| 000 0
007			ta
008			191008t20192019my a|||f |||| 000 0 eng d
020			_aTHE0008099(Local) _qhardback
040			_aUMP _beng _cUMP _erda
090			_aFKASA .S93 2019 r Bc.
100	1		_aSyahirah Ibrahim, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aPedestrian behaviour at unsignalised zebra crossing in university campus / _cSyahirah Ibrahim
264		1	_aKuantan, Pahang : _bUMP, _c2019
264		4	_c© 2019
300			_axii, 59 pages : _billustrations (some color) ; _c30 cm. + _e1 CD-ROM
336			_atext _2rdacontent
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
338			_acomputer disc _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
500			_aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources
502			_aProject Paper (Bachelors of Civil Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2019
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references
520	3		_aThe interest toward promoting walking culture has been increased dramatically especially in many cities across the nation. This is also includes universities worldwide that have started seeking ways to increase pedestrian activities. Hence, campus planners must address the mobility and accessibility needs of pedestrian in their communities to ensure safety, functionality and conducive living and learning environment. However, there are several issues accounted in physical development planning that lead to failure in creating a conducive environment. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the pedestrian preference, perception and behaviour towards the pedestrian facilities in university environment. In this scope of this study, the unsignalised zebra crossing in UMP Gambang and IIUM Kuantan was selected as study location. This study was conducted using qualitative and quantitative approaches by means of questionnaire distribution and also movement data collection. Then the Average Index Method was performed to indicate the pedestrian preference and perception towards the pedestrian facilities. In addition, the descriptive analysis of pedestrian behavior also has been analysed. Findings shows the students agree that using a pedestrian crosswalk save pedestrian time and more safety although during at night. Besides, IIUM student mostly not prefer to cross at designated pedestrian crosswalk compared with UMP students due to the locations not strategic and the numbers of crosswalk are not adequate. The mean speed of male pedestrian is significantly higher compared to female pedestrian in both universities. The waiting time for most pedestrian was very promptly as low as 2 seconds between both campuses. The mean walking speed of an individual is significantly higher compared to the group of three or more people between both campuses. By using statistical method of t-test, the significant two-tailed P value is less than 0.05. So, there is a statistically significant difference between UMP and IIUM in terms of speed distribution.
610	2	0	_aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources _xDissertations
650		0	_aUniversities and colleges _xDisertations
650		0	_aTheses
942			_2lcc _cPSM