000			03940nam a22003617a 4500
999			_c90832 _d90838
003			MY-KuUP
005			20251125105400.0
007			ta
008			191010t20192019my a|||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_aTHE0008207(Local)
040			_beng _cUMP _erda
090			_aFKASA .A44 2019 r Bc.
100	0		_aAbdulmajeed Ali Mohammed Nasser Al-Hokabi, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aStudy of the mechanical properties of bottom ash as a partial sand replacement in a non-load bearing fly ash bricks / _cAbdulmajeed Ali Mohammed Nasser Al-Hokabi
264		1	_aKuantan, Pahang : _bUMP, _c2019
264			_a© 2019
300			_avii, 55 pages : _bIllustrations (some color) ; _c30 cm. + _e1 CD-ROM
336			_2rdacontent _atext
336			_2rdacontent _atext
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated
337			_2rdamedia _acomputer
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume
338			_2rdacarrier _acomputer disc
347			_2rda _atext file _bPDF
500			_aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources
502			_aProject Paper (Bachelor of Civil Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2019
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references
520	3		_aThe worldwide production of coal ashes is estimated to more than 800 million tonnes in 2012. Coal use is forecast to rise over 50% to 2030, with developing countries responsible for 97% of this increase worldwide. The estimated worldwide production of coal ashes is around 13.33 billion tonnes in 2030. The reuse rate for fly ash is around 47% whereas the reuse of bottom ash is only around 5.28%. It has contributed to environmental problems such as contaminating ground and surface water due to limitation of dumping space, where it is still treated as waste and put in impoundment ponds, silos or landfills. By using Coal waste to replace cement production, the environmental benefits occur and lead to decrease CO2 emissions by 0.9 tonnes for each ton of fly Ash used. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), living next to a coal ash disposal site can increase human health risk of cancer or other diseases. It can also affect drinking water from a well where humans may get cancer from drinking water contaminated with arsenic. In Malaysia, there are seven coal fired electric power station for the time being. In peninsular Malaysia, there are four coal fired electric power station that produced at least 1400 MW of electric power. Coal waste is produced which includes coal ash in the fraction of about 75-85 % Fly Ash (FA) and 15-25 % Bottom Ash (BA). The study was conducted using the waste products from Tanjung Bin power plant which located in Mukim Serkat, Daerah Pontian, and Johor, Malaysia that started operation in September, 2006 with a capacity of (2100MW) electricity generating capacity. It is one out of the four thermal power plants that utilize pulverized coal in the generation of electricity. Tanjung Bin power station produce 180 tonnes per day of bottom ash and 1,620 tonnes per day of fly ash from 18,000 tonnes per day of coal. This study presents the results of investigation the probability of using Bottom-ash products in producing Fly-Ash bricks by substituting 20% of cement with FA and fine aggregate (river sand) with partial replacement of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% of BA where sand replacement can save the natural sand resources from depletion and also reduce the coal ash (CA) in Malaysia which classified under the Scheduled Waste (SW 104) Environmental Quality Act. The results of compressive strength at 7,14 and 28 days of air curing showed that the compressive strength and flexural strength decrease with the increasing of sand replacement of the bottom ash while noticed an obvious increment of the water absorption ratio with increasing BA percentage.
610	2	0	_aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources
650		0	_aDissertations _xUniversities and colleges
650		0	_aTheses
942			_2lcc _cPSM