000			03041ntm a2200373 i 4500
999			_c90990 _d90996
003			MY-KuUP
005			20251125105413.0
006			t||||fr|||| 000 0
007			ta
008			191024t20182018my ab||fram|| 000 0 eng d
020			_aTHE0008170(Local) _qhardback
040			_aUMP _beng _cUMP _erda
090			_aFKASA .M375 2018 r Bc.
100	0		_aMasitah Abdullah, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aProperties and liquefaction risk on bulk cargo carrying Bukit Goh, Kuantan bauxite accordance to IMSBC code / _cMasitah Abdullah
264		1	_aKuantan, Pahang : _bUMP, _c2018
264		4	_c© 2018
300			_axv, 72 pages : _billustrations, maps ; _c30 cm. + _e1 CD-ROM
336			_atext _2rdacontent
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
338			_acomputer disc _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _2rda _bPDF
500			_aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources
502			_aProject Paper (Bachelors of Civil Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2018
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references
520	3		_aThis study focus on the differences of geotechnical properties between raw and processed Bukit Goh bauxite. As bauxite material has high clay content which mostly composed of silicate minerals, it has high risk to cause cargo liquefaction which in turn causes catastrophic incident. This paper includes the analysis of raw and processed bauxite where its fine particle contents has been minimized using beneficiation method to reduce the risk of liquefaction by referring to the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes Code (IMSBC Code) standard. To analyze these characteristics of the bauxite, four samples were selected at Bukit Goh, Kuantan; two of the samples from the Bukit Goh mine and two samples from stock pile were tested to identify the bauxite geotechnical properties by referring to GEOSPEC 3: Model Specification for Soil Testing; particle size distribution, moisture content, specific gravity, morphological properties as well as its elemental and oxide properties. Laboratory tests involved including Small Pycnometer test, Dry Sieve test, Specific Gravity test, X-ray fluorescence test (XRF) and Field emission scanning electron microscopy test (FESEM). The results show that average moisture content of raw bauxite is 24.33% which exceeded the recommended value of maximum 10% while the average moisture content of processed bauxite is only 7.16%. The average fine material for raw bauxite is 38.50% which should not be greater than 30% per IMSBC standard while for processed bauxite is 21.40%. From the FESEM image, it was clearly shown that the fine particles of processed bauxite is lesser than raw bauxite. In conclusion, the quality and safety of processed bauxite is better than raw bauxite.
610	2	0	_aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources _xDissertations
650		0	_aUniversities and colleges _xDisertations
650		0	_aTheses
942			_2lcc _cPSM