000			02856ntm a2200373 i 4500
999			_c92349 _d92355
003			MY-KuUP
005			20251125105539.0
006			t||||fr|||| 000 0
007			ta
008			200624t20192019my a|||fram|| 000 0 eng d
020			_aTHE0008649(Local) _qhardback
040			_aUMP _beng _cUMP _erda
090			_aFKASA .N35 2019 r Bc.
100	0		_aNor Najjatulnajihah Mohd Hamizul, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aEffective bracing system for transmissionline towers / _cNor Najjatulnajihah Mohd Hamizul
264		1	_aKuantan, Pahang : _bUMP, _c2019
264		4	_c© 2019
300			_axiv, 72 pages : _billustrations ; _c30 cm. + _e1 CD-ROM
336			_atext _2rdacontent
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
338			_acomputer disc _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
500			_aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources
502			_aProject Paper (Bachelors of Civil Engineering) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2019
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references
520	3		_aTransmission line tower which usually affected by the wind load need to be designed to resist the wind load. The transmission line tower should have effective height and effective bracing system in order to give better performance to resist the load. In this research, the transmission line tower was in the form of suspension tower were modelled and designed in Staadpro V8i. Two types of bracing system, K and X system were assigned to the tower. These towers were modeled by considering the effects of tower height which include 39 m, 49 m and 100 m height and were developed with three wind speeds which include 32.5 m/s, 33.5 m/s and 40 m/s in Staadpro V8i. Comparison was made based on the displacement and axial load. It was found that the tower with height 39 m and 49 m gives K bracing system as the effective bracing system and tower with height 100 m showed X bracing system is the effective bracing system. In terms of displacement, 39 m tower with K bracing system that was subjected to 32.5 m/s, 33.5 m/s, and 40 m/s wind speed showed that the displacement was reduced similar to that of 49 m tower height. In contrast, 100 m tower height with K bracing system showed that the displacement increased from the X bracing system. In terms of axial load, 39 m tower subjected to the wind speed of 32.5 m/s, 33.5 m/s, and 40 m/s showed that the K bracing system reduced from the X bracing system, similar to that of 49 m tower. As for the 100 m tower, K bracing system exhibited higher axial load which approximately 46% compared to the X bracing system.
610	2	0	_aFaculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources _xDisertations
650		0	_aUniversities and colleges _xDisertations
650		0	_aTheses
942			_2lcc _cPSM