000			03143ntm a2200373 i 4500
999			_c99536 _d99542
003			MY-KuUP
005			20251125110740.0
006			t||||fr|||| 000 0
007			ta
008			230612b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_aTHE0009656 (Local) _qHardback
040			_aUMP _beng _cUMP _erda
090			_aFIM .A37 2019 r Thesis
100	1		_aSiti Aissah Binti Mad Ali, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aEnhancement of software project performance by overcoming waste, volatility and constraints simultaneously / _cSiti Aissah Binti Mad Ali
264		1	_aKuantan, Pahang : _bUMP, _c2019
264		4	_c©2019
300			_axiii, 142 pages : _billustration (some col.) ; _c30 cm. _e1 CD-ROM
336			_2rdacontent _atext
336			_2rdacontent _atext
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated
337			_2rdamedia _acomputer
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume
338			_2rdacarrier _acomputer disc
347			_2rda _atext file _bPDF
500			_aFaculty of Industrial Management
502			_aThesis (Master of Science) -- Universiti Malaysia Pahang – 2019
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references
520	3		_aThere have been many projects and researches conducted to identify software projects’ failure and success factors. The success factors were always remained as best practices as it favours desired results while the failure factors are always avoided as it yields undesired factors. However, it is least understood that focusing on avoiding a failure factor could actually influence other forms of failure risk(s). In this study, it has been understood through literature review that most of the findings on software projects failure factors have been repetitive for more than two decades. These failure factors commonality was then understood and categorized by bridging few studies and experts’ opinions based on three well-known theories; Lean, Requirement Volatility and Theory of Constraints. There are nine types of wastes, three types errors that leads to requirement volatility and eight types of constraints in relevance to software projects. Through literature and discussion with 15 experts it was apparent that there could be interdependency and interrelationship amongst these 20 variables. The relationship amongst the variables were studied by employing the DEMATEL methodology. DEMATEL was opted to show the Impact Relation Map which could serve as a good source of reference to help decision makers formulate their decisions pertaining these 20 variables. A Software Project Success Framework was then developed to assist the foundation for planning and prioritizing relevant mitigations and corrective measures about software projects failure factors. Requirement volatility has been emphasized as the main cause of software project failure. It does not only cause direct impact towards software projects failure but also influences other identified factors to affect the sotware project performance adversely.
610	2	0	_aFaculty of Industrial Management _xDissertations
650		0	_aUniversities and colleges _xDissertations
650		0	_aThesis _xDissertations
942			_2lcc _cTHESIS